This study assumes that James Joyce and Emmanuel Lévinas have an analogous view on human relations. The analysis of Joyce¡¯s homeward motif in ¡°Ithaca¡± episode in Ulysses, along with Lévinas¡¯s ethics, as a sober reflection on the imperfectible inter-individual relations rather than a mere event of returning to home furthers this analogy. Leopold Bloom, the main character, makes his way home late at dawn after a day-long wandering, being obsessed by his wife¡¯s infidelity. He is accompanied by Stephen Dedalus whom he has eyed as his spiritual son. However, in fact, they are almost strangers to each other. Still Bloom tries to form a spiritual bond with his guest to offset his anxiety and loneliness. But he fails, and therein lies a truism. Bloom can¡¯t fathom the most intimate person to him—his wife—fully, much less a stranger. The same goes for the readers. Despite every information about Bloom, we never know him completely! Lévinas resonates with Joyce in respect to this theme. Since we¡¯re imperfect and finite beings in essence, according to Lévinas, the perfect and infinite knowledge is beyond our reach. But these limitations are easily overlooked. That¡¯s why we need to keep distance from the world through dwelling. Being separated from there, we can see the defective human conditions as they are. |