º»¹® ¹Ù·Î°¡±â ´ë¸Þ´º ¹Ù·Î°¡±â

Çѱ¹Á¦ÀÓ½ºÁ¶À̽ºÇÐȸ

Çѱ¹Á¦ÀÓ½ºÁ¶À̽ºÇÐȸ The James Joyce Society of Korea

  • Ȩ
  • JJÀú³Î
  • ÇÐȸÁö°Ë»ö

ÇÐȸÁö°Ë»ö

»ó¼¼º¸±â
±¹¹®Á¦¸ñ ¡°Pulcra Sunt Quae Visa Placent¡±: Colonial Ambivalence, Third Space, and Altering Perception in Stephen Dedalus`s Aesthetic Theory
¿µ¹®Á¦¸ñ ¡°Pulcra Sunt Quae Visa Placent¡±: Colonial Ambivalence, Third Space, and Altering Perception in Stephen Dedalus`s Aesthetic Theory
ÀúÀÚ Seong Hoon Kim
Ãâó Çѱ¹Á¦ÀÓ½ºÁ¶À̽ºÇÐȸ , Á¦ÀÓ½ºÁ¶À̽º Àú³Î | 20±Ç 2È£ 5 ~ 29, ÃÑ 25 pages
±Ç 20±Ç
È£ 2È£
¹ßÇà³â 2014
³í¹®ÀÚ·á [÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ ´Ù¿î¹Þ±â] a14-1.pdf

 James Joyce¡¯s attitude toward Irish politics as developed in the character of Stephen Dedalus involves ¡°postcolonial¡± ambivalence and third space, and is crucially represented in Stephen¡¯s aesthetic theory and in the bird girl epiphany in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Stephen Hero. Stephen¡¯s theory is not an apolitical aestheticism but a realistic manifesto that engages Irish coloniality, culture, and politics, which indicates a postcolonial strategy that is not subsumed into colonizing mission but which works toward the creation of a new Irish art. Particularly, the three phases of perception, integritas, consonantia, and claritas (or quidditas), in Stephen¡¯s aesthetic theory serve to ground Stephen¡¯s ambivalent position as such an Irish colonial subject searching for a third space in between Catholic tradition and colonial modernity. The epiphanic scene of the ¡°bird girl¡± is where many important aspects of the theory appear-mimicry and ambivalence, subversion of gaze, and alternative perception-as a process of undermining colonial power and authority. 

°Ô½Ã±Û ÀÌÀü±Û, ´ÙÀ½±Û º¸±â
ÀÌÀü±Û ¼Ò·Ð, ³ëÆ®, ±âŸ : ¡ºÀ²¸®½Ã½º¡»µ¶È¸:¡¸Æä³Ú·ÎÆ䡹
´ÙÀ½±Û ¡°I Always Destroy What I Love Most¡±: Julian Bell`s Romantic Failure